Sunday, January 31, 2021

Muslim Council of Britain elects first female leader


 

Zara Mohammedimage copyrightMCB/ PA Media

The Muslim Council of Britain has elected its first female leader.

Zara Mohammed said it was an "honour" to be appointed as the new secretary general after winning the most votes in a poll of affiliate groups of the UK's largest Muslim umbrella organisation.

She succeeds Harun Khan, who completed a maximum of four years as the head of the MCB.

The 29-year-old from Glasgow said she hoped more women and young people would be inspired to seek leadership roles.

She said: "I think women sometimes hesitate to take on leadership roles even though they are more than qualified to do so.

"It is really important to engage young people, engage more women and diversify the organisation and the work we are doing."

Mayor of London Sadiq Khan tweeted that Ms Mohammed's appointment was "terrific".

Mr Khan said: "I wish the very best of success to Zara Mohammed - may she continue to lead this organisation to greater heights for the betterment of our communities across the country."

Ms Mohammed is a masters graduate in human rights law and a training and development consultant.

She said that she aimed to "continue to build a truly inclusive, diverse and representative body", driven by the needs of British Muslims "for the common good".

She previously served as an assistant secretary general for the MCB.

Silver surges as Reddit army turns to commodities

Silver bullionimage copyrightGetty Images

Silver prices leapt to a five-month high on Monday on social media calls to buy the metal and emulate the frenzy that drove up GameStop shares.

Shares in a handful of smaller Australian mining firms surged as small-time traders bought en masse.

Argent Minerals, Boab Metals and Investigator Resources leapt more than 15%.

Coin-selling websites also reported unprecedented demand and flagged delays in delivering silver.

Silver rose as much as 7% to $28.99 an ounce, its highest value since mid-August.

The moves are the latest example of small-time traders buying stocks and other assets that large Wall Street funds bet against, resulting in large losses for major investors.

Some users in the Reddit forum Wallstreetbets argued that silver is a heavily manipulated market, and a surge in the silver price could hurt large Wall Street players.

"Think about the Gainz. If you don't care about the gains, think about the banks like JP MORGAN you'd be destroying along the way," said Reddit user RocketBoomGo, in a widely circulated post.

Some members of the forum have argued against the move, suggesting it would benefit the same funds that stood to benefit from betting against GameStop.

The recent GameStop surge, which was also fuelled by retail investors, was also seen as a revolt against large institutional investors.

Unlike GameStop, which was a loss-making gaming retailer that many investment funds had bet against, Silver has seen strong growth over the past year.

media captionWATCH: What's been going on at GameStop?

"There is this curious situation now where the Reddit crowd has turned its sights on a bigger whale in terms of trying to catalyse something of a short squeeze in the silver market," said Kyle Rodda, an analyst at brokerage IG Markets in Melbourne.

"There's a lot of commentary on these platforms to pile in to the miners."

Silver prices are up 15% since Wednesday's close, around the time when messages began circulating on forums such as Reddit encouraging users to buy the metal and drive up prices.

Massive losses for Melvin

The latest surge comes as the damage to one Wall Street firm becomes clearer.

Hedge fund Melvin Capital lost 53% in January, according to media reports.

However, the firm received commitments for fresh cash from investors in the last days of January, and ended the month with $8bn (£5.8bn) in assets after having started the year with roughly $12.5bn, according to Reuters.

The firm had bet that ailing video game retailer GameStop's stock, which traded at less than $5 five months ago, would fall further.

But retail investors, comparing notes on social media platform Reddit, bought the stock and sent it higher to close at $325 on Friday.

 

Covid vaccine offered to all care homes in England

Care home resident Michael Starr, 78, receives an injection of the coronavirus vaccine at Andrew Cohen House in Birminghamimage copyrightPA Media

A Covid vaccine has been offered to residents at every eligible care home in England, the NHS has announced.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson described the achievement, expected to be confirmed by official figures on Monday, as a "crucial milestone".

A target of 15 February has been set for the UK to vaccinate care home residents and carers, people over 70 and frontline care workers.

On Saturday a record 598,389 first jabs were given across the UK.

It means nearly nine million people have received the first dose of a vaccine, with about 490,000 having received two jabs.

NHS England said more than 10,000 care homes with older residents had been offered vaccines, although a "small remainder" of homes had visits deferred by local public health directors for safety reasons during local outbreaks.

These will be visited by vaccinators as soon as NHS staff are allowed to do so, it said.

Mr Johnson said vaccines were the "route out of the pandemic" but warned there will be "difficult moments to come" with the number of cases and people in hospital still "dangerously high".

"Today marks a crucial milestone in our ongoing race to vaccinate the most vulnerable against this deadly disease," he said.

The Joint Committee on Vaccinations and Immunisation (JCVI) sets which groups are prioritised for vaccinations, with residents in care homes and their carers in the top group.

All those over 70 years old, clinically extremely vulnerable people and frontline health and social care workers make up the top four groups which the government has said should be inoculated by mid-February.

In Scotland, the government has said the programme for first doses for care home residents, frontline health and social care workers and those aged 80 and over would be completed by 5 February.

Around 75% of care home residents in Wales have had their first jab, while in Northern Ireland the government has said 100% of care homes have received a first dose.

Vaccines

NHS England chief executive Sir Simon Stevens said the vaccination campaign was off to a "flying start" as a result of an "amazing partnership working between our GPs, community nurses and care homes".

Liz Kendall, shadow social care minister, said that after the "appalling loss of life in care homes" it was "very good news" that vaccines had been offered to all elderly care home residents.

"We are in a race against time against this awful virus and ministers must leave no stone overturned to vaccinate all social care staff within the next two weeks," she added.

Labour has previously called for teachers to be moved up the JCVI priority list and said February half-term should be used to vaccinate teaching staff.

The vaccinations committee has said early vaccination of certain professions should be considered - but only once those in the top nine priority groups have been offered a first jab.

Fiona Carragher, director of research and influencing at Alzheimer's Society, said it was "great" the milestone had been met but she remained concerned that the staff vaccination rollout "has not been nearly so effective".

"The most pressing question now is how and when can care homes restart safe, meaningful visits. Combined with PPE and testing, isn't one jab enough? If not, what else needs to be in place? Another 12-week wait is unacceptable for people dying of loneliness," she said.

The news was welcomed by the care sector with Vic Rayner, executive director of the National Care Forum, saying it was "an amazing outcome".

Care UK chief executive Andrew Knight said almost all the company's residents had been offered a jab and "the majority of our colleagues" had been vaccinated.

Banner image reading 'more about coronavirus'
Banner

A further 587 deaths within 28 days of a positive Covid test were reported on Sunday.

It takes the UK's total by that measure to 106,158, although the number of reported deaths tends to be lower over the weekend.

In other developments:

 

Many Democrats signal push for swift impeachment trial as short as 'a matter of days'

(CNN)With former President Donald Trump's Senate impeachment trial increasingly looking like it will end in acquittal, many Democrats are hoping for a swift trial as short as "a matter of days" -- and are ready to move on to key items of President Joe Biden's agenda, starting with delivering a $1.9 trillion Covid relief package.

"I think that there should be a trial and it can be relatively expeditious, a matter of days, not weeks," Sen. Richard Blumenthal, a Connecticut Democrat, told CNN's Jim Sciutto Thursday.
Democrats are sensitive to ensuring Trump has a full trial with clear evidence. But they worry a long trial will compete for floor time with Biden's long list of legislative priorities -- especially his large Covid relief package -- and getting his Cabinet and other top government officials confirmed.
Democrats are also arguing that because there is only one article of impeachment -- incitement of insurrection -- and lawmakers all witnessed the events firsthand, the proceedings should be able to move quickly.
"I don't think, based upon the limited nature of the impeachment article, that it should take anywhere near the last impeachment (trial)," New Jersey Democratic Sen. Bob Menendez said, referring to the 2020 trial that lasted nearly three weeks.
"This is a much less complicated set of facts than when we were dealing with Ukraine," added Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut, referring to Trump's first Senate impeachment trial where he was charged with two articles of impeachment after an investigation into his pressure on Ukrainian officials to investigate his political rival at the time, Biden.
It's not yet clear how long Trump's impeachment trial will last -- and the length will depend, in part, on how long House impeachment managers take to present their case, how long Trump's defense team takes to respond, and when senators are ready to vote on a final judgment.
"The House has to make a decision about how much time it's gonna take and what evidence it wants to put forward" and Trump's legal team "has to get at least equal time, and probably more so that the fairness of the proceeding's assured," Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, a Rhode Island Democrat, told reporters on Wednesday.
Now that Democrats have won the presidency, House and Senate, they're anxious to start moving on Biden's $1.9 trillion relief legislation after settling for a smaller stimulus package in December, which Democratic leaders said was just a start.
"To do a trial knowing you'll get 55 votes at the max seems to me to be not the right prioritization of our time right now. Obviously we do a trial, maybe we can do it fast, but my top priority is Covid relief... and getting the Biden Cabinet approved," Virginia Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine said.
"I would hope that we deal with that as quickly as possible to start addressing the needs of working families," Sen. Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent, said on Wednesday.
Sen. Brian Schatz, Democrat from Hawaii, said Thursday there's "no reason" Trump's trial should take weeks when "we don't even have a full complement of Biden Cabinet nominees who have been confirmed."
Many Democrats also argue since the senators themselves were witnesses to the attack -- there may not be a need to drag out the trial longer than a few days or a week.
Whitehouse also speculated Wednesday that perhaps it'll be in Trump's best interest, as well, to have a quick trial. "It may very well be perceived by Trump's team and to be in his interest to minimize, minimize, minimize, rather than draw him out and continue the emphasis on this sort of episode," the Rhode Island Democrat added.
Many Democrats and Republicans alike have pointed to the vote on GOP Sen. Rand Paul's point of order to vote on the constitutionality of Trump's impeachment trial on Tuesday as an indicator for how the trial's final vote will likely land. Only five Republicans joined all Democrats to kill the Kentucky Republican's motion, and there is no sense that anywhere close to 17 Republicans would vote to convict the former President.

 

Hawley now says objection to Biden's win wasn't intended to keep Trump in office despite past comments

 Photo shows Senator Josh Hawley acknowledging Trump supporters | ksdk.com

(CNN)A defiant Sen. Josh Hawley insisted on Thursday that he never intended to overturn the presidential election by objecting to President Joe Biden's victory in Pennsylvania -- despite previously suggesting that Donald Trump could stay in power if Congress acted.

In the aftermath of pro-Trump rioters storming the Capitol seeking to stop the January 6 certification of Biden's win, the first-term Missouri Republican senator has faced a barrage of criticism over his decision to contest the results of Pennsylvania -- with Senate Democrats calling on the Senate Ethics Committee to investigate his actions and others calling on him and GOP Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas to resign.
But Hawley has said he has "no" regrets, telling CNN: "I was very clear from the beginning that I was never attempting to overturn the election."
Yet before January 6, Hawley didn't rule out the possibility that Congress could throw out the electoral results and keep Trump in office. On January 4, Hawley was asked by Fox News: "Are you trying to say that as of January 20th that President Trump will be president?" He responded to anchor Bret Baier: "Well, Bret that depends on what happens on Wednesday. I mean this is why we have the debate. This is why we have the votes." Hawley repeatedly declined to say Congress wouldn't be able to change the results of Biden's win.
On Thursday, CNN pressed Hawley on the discrepancy between his claim that he never attempted to overturn the election and his January 4 comments that Trump could still be President depending "on what happens" on January 6 and his refusal then to rule out Congress could change the outcome. Hawley contended he's been consistent on the point that January 6 was the final day of the electoral process, arguing his sole intention behind objecting was aimed at sparking debate over Pennsylvania's voting system.
"I said to (Baier), what I consistently said ... To me, January 6th is the end of this process, that's when the votes are counted, certified, the election winner under the Constitution is officially declared," Hawley claimed. "To, me that's the end of the line."
Hawley also would not say if he should have answered Baier differently and responded with the accurate assertion: That Biden would be the next president because there was never a chance that Congress would overturn the result. He said his words would have been twisted no matter what.
"I think that the liberal onslaught of lies to twist and misconstrue and attack me, it doesn't matter what I say or what I do, they're going to tell the lies no matter what," Hawley said as he walked through the halls of the Capitol. "They are going to say you wanted to overturn the election, they are going to say you incited violence, all of which are lies."
Hawley's objection on January 6 was significant because Congress can throw out electoral votes if at least one House member and one senator object to a state's results, followed by majority votes in both chambers. With wide bipartisan majorities opposing efforts in Congress to discard any state's electoral results, Hawley's move was bound to fail.
But after he became the first senator to announce he would object, Hawley effectively gave hope to pro-Trump activists and fervent supporters that the defeated GOP President could still hold onto power, a far-fetched idea that the then-President actively promoted.
Hawley on Thursday insisted that he was simply trying to spark a debate about voting "irregularities" in Pennsylvania -- not change the outcome.
"It's crystal clear what my intentions were, and what I was hoping to achieve, which is to draw attention to what happened in Pennsylvania and other irregularities and to try to force some congressional action, some debate," Hawley said. "I objected to that state for that reason, and that was me representing my constituents."
Yet federal and state judges rejected several GOP lawsuits alleging irregularities and illegal voting in Pennsylvania. Democratic and Republican election officials certified the results in every single county, rejecting baseless GOP claims that the outcome was tainted by widespread fraud or improprieties. Plus, Pennsylvania's vote-by-mail law — which Trump and his allies attacked as unfair and unconstitutional — was passed long before the pandemic struck with strong GOP support in the state legislature.
In his December 30 announcement that he would object to the electoral results, Hawley didn't say his goal was to overturn the election. But he also didn't mention that his effort wouldn't change Biden's Electoral College victory.
Hawley and other GOP objectors frequently point out that Democrats objected to the electoral results in 2001, 2005 and 2017. Yet, in all those races, the Democratic presidential candidate had long conceded, and the only time a senator joined a House effort was in 2005, when then-Sen. Barbara Boxer joined House Democrats in objecting to Ohio's electoral results. She was the lone senator to vote to discard that state's results.
This time, Trump mounted a months-long campaign to discredit the elections, repeating lies and conspiracies that the election was "rigged" and "stolen" while promoting the January 6 rally before the joint session of Congress met to tally the results -- all of which led to the deadly riot in the Capitol that day.
Asked if his actions perpetuated the lie that the election was stolen, Hawley pushed back.
"I've never used that rhetoric and I was very clear as to why I was objecting and what I was doing," Hawley said. "So, absolutely not."
Hawley, who is frequently seen as a possible 2024 presidential contender, insists that "I'm not" running in the next presidential election. And facing a Senate ethics complaint, Hawley says he has not yet heard from committee investigators (he filed a counter-complaint this week against the Democrats whom he accused of abusing the process in unfairly targeting him).
Last week, Hawley called Trump's remarks on January 6 to the rally "inflammatory. I think they were irresponsible. I think they were wrong." And after the rioters ransacked the Capitol, he condemned the violence and insurrectionists while arguing the proper way to mount a challenge was in the halls of Congress.
Yet despite pleas from his colleagues to drop his objection and show unity after the deadly rampage, Hawley still objected to the Pennsylvania results, which failed overwhelmingly in the Senate, 7-92. Hawley also voted for Cruz's challenge to Arizona's results, an effort that was rejected by a 6-93 vote.
"This is not about messaging," Hawley said when asked about whether he should have changed his own rhetoric ahead of January 6. "This is an attempt to silence political opponents. This is a brazen attempt to shut down democratic debate."

 

What to know for this week in Washington: Stimulus and impeachment

U.S. President Joe Biden speaks during the 59th Presidential Inauguration in Washington, U.S., January 20, 2021. Patrick Semansky/Pool via REUTERS

Washington (CNN)President Joe Biden's core pledge to promote national unity is headed for its first real challenge this week as his nascent administration faces down a host of tough political realities.

Beyond negotiations over Covid-19 relief and the terms of former President Donald Trump's impeachment trial (more on those in a minute), Biden's team is moving toward additional confirmation hearings for his Cabinet -- and pressing ahead with policy changes by executive action.
Here's a look at the week ahead:
Tuesday, February 2
Biden on Tuesday is set to deliver remarks and sign an executive order "advancing his priority to modernize our immigration system," Psaki said. A draft calendar document viewed by CNN's Betsy Klein previously outlines executive action on:
  • Regional migration and border processing
  • The US refugee policy
  • The establishment of a family reunification task force
  • An immediate review of the Public Charge Rule
Agriculture Secretary nominee Tom Vilsack's confirmation hearing before the Senate Agriculture Committee is also scheduled for Tuesday.
Wednesday, February 3
Biden's nominee to head the Environmental Protection Agency, Michael Regan, is set to have his own confirmation hearing before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.
Thursday, February 4
Biden's nominee for labor secretary, Boston Mayor Marty Walsh, has his confirmation hearing before the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions.
Friday, February 5
Labeled "Jobs Day" at the White House, Psaki said Biden will deliver remarks about the economy.

Stimulus scramble

Ten Republican senators announced plans to unveil a roughly $600 billion Covid-19 relief package as a counteroffer to the $1.9 trillion plan Biden has outlined.
  • The senators said their framework includes a total of $160 billion for vaccine development and distribution, testing and tracing, and treatment and supplies, including the production and deployment of personal protective equipment.
  • It would also include a new round of direct payments for "families who need assistance the most," extend enhanced federal unemployment benefits at the current level and provide $4 billion to bolster behavioral health and substance abuse.
The Republican proposal represents the most significant response yet to the White House's planned package, though with a price tag more than a trillion dollars less than the Democratic plan, the GOP proposal will likely face opposition from congressional Democrats.
Biden is open to some negotiation on the relief package, a senior administration official said. The White House would be open to considering scaling down stimulus checks for families making more than $150,000 per year, the official said. Read more from CNN's Pamela Brown and Caroline Kenny.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer told the New York Daily News Sunday that the Republican proposal is insufficient, stating that Republicans should "negotiate with us, not make a take-it-or-leave-it offer."
But Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders said that he thinks there are enough Democratic votes to pass Biden's relief package through a process known as reconciliation.
"All of us will have differences of opinions, this is a $1.9 trillion bill, I have differences and concerns about this bill, but at the end of the day we are going to support the President of the United States," the incoming chairman of the Senate Budget Committee said when asked during an interview with ABC News.
The political reality: Any bipartisan plan will likely lose votes on the Democratic side, meaning for every progressive senator against the proposal, they'd need another Republican supporting it. Still, this idea of putting two plans side by side is one that aides and members have been discussing for several days as a way to force the conversation back to a bipartisan place.

Legal drama for Trump

Trump's five impeachment defense attorneys left a little more than a week before his trial is set to begin, according to people familiar with the case, amid a disagreement over his legal strategy.
CNN's Gloria Borger, Kaitlan Collins, Jeff Zeleny and Ashley Semler were first to report: Butch Bowers and Deborah Barbier, who were expected to be two of the lead attorneys, are no longer on the team. A source familiar with the changes said it was a mutual decision for both to leave the legal team. As the lead attorney, Bowers assembled the team.
  • Josh Howard, a North Carolina attorney who was recently added to the team, has also left, according to another source familiar with the changes.
  • Johnny Gasser and Greg Harris, from South Carolina, are no longer involved with the case, either.
Trump's office announced late Sunday that he had named David Schoen and Bruce L. Castor, Jr. to head the legal team. Read the latest here.
But, as CNN's Maeve Reston notes, even as Trump scrambles to rebuild a defense team, he still benefits from an unfaltering loyalty from the GOP: After a brief flirtation with reason and sound judgment in the weeks following the January 6 siege at the Capitol, the Republican Party has decided to honor their deep and often blind allegiance to Trump, choosing to overlook his role in inciting the deadly insurrection rather than pay the price of crossing him and his base next year at the ballot box.

Covid-19 update

The US Covid-19 death numbers are still horrific. A rapid variant spread could push our numbers even higher. And vaccine skepticism remains a looming issue.
But for the first time in a long time, there is also some real reason for hope.
Hospitalizations are down. Covid-19 hospitalizations in the US dropped below 100,000 for the first time in nearly two months, according to data from the COVID Tracking Project.
Vaccination pace is picking up considerably. More than 31 million vaccine doses have been administered nationwide, according to CDC data. That's a jump of about 1.5 million administered doses since Saturday.
And more help could be here very soon. Johnson & Johnson is expected to apply to the US Food and Drug Administration this coming week for emergency use authorization. The single-shot vaccine was 72% effective against moderate and severe disease in the US, the company said.
Expect to see more masks as you travel. An order issued by the CDC requiring people to wear masks while using any form of public transportation in the US will go into effect tomorrow night.
The agency said public transportation operators must use best efforts to enforce the mandate, including only boarding those wearing masks and disembarking passengers who refuse to comply.
The bottom line: Deaths would stay lower if Americans simply wore masks and stayed home more. The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation predicts if most people followed social distancing and masking guidelines 30,000 fewer people would die by May 1.

 

Myanmar's military seizes power in coup after detaining leader Aung San Suu Kyi and ruling party politicians

 10+ Aung San Suu Kyi ideas | san, burma, national league for democracy

(CNN)Myanmar's powerful military has taken control of the country in a coup and declared a state of emergency, following the detention of Aung San Suu Kyi and other senior government leaders in early morning raids Monday.

The country woke up to widespread communications blackouts and soldiers in army fatigues patrolling City Hall in the biggest city Yangon. Residents turning on their television sets could only access the military-owned Myawaddy TV channel, with all other news channels seemingly blocked.
As news filtered through that the country's democratically-elected leaders had been detained in the capital -- hours before the first session of the new parliament was set to open -- a news anchor announced on the military-owned channel that power had been handed over to army chief Min Aung Hlaing.
In the address, the military confirmed it had detained the country's de facto civilian leader Suu Kyi, along with other high ranking National League for Democracy (NLD) leaders, in response to alleged voting irregularities in November's election.
The coup followed weeks of worsening political tensions in the country over the disputed election and rumors that the military could take over had been swirling for days.
Spokesperson for the ruling NLD, Myo Nyunt, confirmed the detentions to CNN Monday, saying that, "State Counsellor Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and some other senior figures are being detained in (the capital city of) Naypyidaw.
"The military seems to take control of the capital now," he added. Myo Nyunt could not be reached by CNN in the hours following the coup.
Along with Suu Kyi, President Win Myint was also detained, according to Reuters, as well as several senior leaders from large states in Myanmar, including the ministers of Shan State, Kayah State, and the NLD Ayeyarwady state spokesperson.
The coup has been widely condemned internationally, with the United States calling on Myanmar's military leaders to "release all government officials and civil society leaders and respect the will of the people."
"The United States expresses grave concern and alarm regarding reports that the Burmese military has detained multiple civilian government leaders, including State Counsellor Aung San Suu Kyi, and civil society leaders," according to a statement from the US Secretary of State Antony Blinken. "The military must reverse these actions immediately."

What led to the coup

In its announcement, signed by the newly installed acting President, former military general, Myint Swe, the military alleges that voter fraud took place in the November 8, 2020 elections and said they had detained political leaders for "failing to take actions, not following the request to postpone lower house and upper house parliament sessions."
Last week, a military spokesperson said it would not rule out a coup if the military's claims of alleged voter fraud into the November 2020 election were not investigated.
Suu Kyi's party the NLD claimed an overwhelming victory in the country's second democratic ballot since the end of direct military rule in 2011, taking 83% of the vote, which allowed the party to form a government. The military-backed Union Solidarity and Development Party won 33 out of a possible 476 seats, fewer than the party expected.
Myanmar's election commission on Thursday rejected claims of voter fraud, saying any errors -- such as duplicated names on voter lists -- were not enough to impact the result of the vote.
Nobel laureate Suu Kyi is widely considered a hero of democracy in Myanmar, where she spent 15 years under house arrest as part of a decades-long fight against military rule.
Following her release, Suu Kyi led her party to a landslide victory in Myanmar's first openly contested election in 2015, establishing its first civilian government after decades of isolation and military authoritarianism.
But her international reputation has been tarnished in recent years by allegations of genocide against Myanmar's Muslim Rohingya population. Myanmar denies the charges and has long claimed to have been targeting terrorists.
On Monday Human rights non-government organization Burma Rights UK said in a post to their Twitter that the news of Suu Kyi's detention was "devastating."
"This needs to be met with the strongest international response. The military need to be made to understand that they have made a major miscalculation in thinking they can get away with this," the group said.

Communications blackout

As Myanmar woke up to news of the coup Monday, there was evidence of significant internet and phone network disruption across the country, which could affect the ability of people to get information or organize any response via social media.
Netblocks, which monitors internet blackouts around the world, said that real-time network data showed a major drop in connectivity in the early hours of Monday morning. Doug Madory, an analyst at Kentik, a network observability company, added on Twitter that there was a "large internet outage" unfolding.
"Continuing disconnections have been monitored with national connectivity falling initially to 75% and subsequently 50% of ordinary levels by 8:00 a.m. local time," according to Netblocks.
Reuters reported that Myanmar state media MRTV is having technical issues and is unable to broadcast, the network said. "Due to current communication difficulties we'd like to respectfully inform you that the regular programs of MRTV and Myanmar Radio cannot be broadcast," Myanmar Radio and Television said on a post on its Facebook page.
Netblocks reported that "technical data show cuts affecting multiple network operators including state-owned Myanma Posts and Telecommunications (MPT) and international operator Telenor, with preliminary findings indicating a centrally ordered mechanism of disruption targeting cellular and some fixed-line services, progressing over time."
Prominent Myanmar historian and author Thant Myint-U said on Twitter Monday that, "The doors just opened to a very different future."
"I have a sinking feeling that no one will really be able to control what comes next. And remember Myanmar's a country awash in weapons, with deep divisions across ethnic and religious lines, where millions can barely feed themselves."

International reaction

The military action has prompted concern and condemnation from the international community.
US President Joe Biden has been briefed on the situation in Myanmar by National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan, according to a statement from White House press secretary Jen Psaki.
"The United States opposes any attempt to alter the outcome of recent elections or impede Myanmar's democratic transition, and will take action against those responsible if these steps are not reversed," the statement said. "We are monitoring the situation closely."
Army chief Min Aung Hlaing has been under US sanctions since December 2019. He was designated for serious human rights abuses related to the atrocities committed against the Rohingya.
Australia on Monday called for the immediate release of Suu Kyi and other senior leaders who are being detained by the military.
In a statement from Australia's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Marise Payne the Minister of Foreign Affairs said, "The Australian Government is deeply concerned at reports the Myanmar military is once again seeking to seize control of Myanmar."
"We call on the military to respect the rule of law, to resolve disputes through lawful mechanisms, and to release immediately all civilian leaders and others who have been detained unlawfully," the statement said.

 

Hong Kong residents now eligible for special UK visa

A visa scheme to allow Hong Kong residents to come to the UK opens on Sunday, with some 300,000 people expected to apply.

The visa, which is open to holders of a British National (Overseas) passport and their immediate dependents, will offer a fast track to UK citizenship.

But the Chinese foreign ministry said it would no longer recognise the BNO passport as a travel document.

The UK launched the new visa after China imposed a new security law.

Those who apply and secure the visa will be able to apply for settlement after five years and then British citizenship after a further 12 months.

Beijing has previously warned the UK not to meddle in domestic issues.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson said the move honoured the UK's "profound ties of history and friendship" with the ex-British colony.

About 7,000 people from Hong Kong have already been allowed to settle in the UK since July, the Home Office said.

Although there are 2.9 million citizens eligible to move to the UK, with a further estimated 2.3 million dependents, the government expects about 300,000 people to take up the offer in the first five years.

The 7,000 who have already arrived were allowed to settle before the scheme began by being granted Leave Outside the Rules, which gives the government discretion over immigration rules on compassionate grounds.

Mr Johnson said: "I am immensely proud that we have brought in this new route for Hong Kong BNOs to live, work and make their home in our country.

"In doing so we have honoured our profound ties of history and friendship with the people of Hong Kong, and we have stood up for freedom and autonomy - values both the UK and Hong Kong hold dear."

Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Zhao Lijian called the scheme a violation of China's sovereignty and gross interference in Hong Kong and China's internal affairs, the country's state-affiliated news website The Paper reported.

"The British side disregarded the fact that Hong Kong returned to China 24 years ago," he said.

China will no longer recognise the BNO passport from Sunday. It is not yet clear what this move will mean.

Hong Kongers use their own Hong Kong passport or ID card to leave the city. To enter mainland China, they need to use their Home Return Permit, issued by Chinese immigration, unless they use a full foreign passport and apply for a visa to enter as a foreigner.

The only time they might use a BNO is upon arrival into the UK, or another country that recognises the document.

line
Analysis box by James Landale, Diplomaitc correspondent

The new visa system helping British nationals escape Hong Kong is perhaps the clearest example yet of the government's promise to be a force for good in the world.

It is one thing to condemn oppression. It is another to do something about it.

And here the UK is delivering on a promise made more than two decades ago to those it has a duty to protect.

But there are questions.

What support are these migrants going to have?

In the long term they may well enrich Britain's economy and culture, but in the short term, they will need help.

Where are they going to live? Where are they going to find jobs? What if more than the predicted 300,000 or so come in the first five years? How will people in Britain respond to seeing their borders opened up?

And above all, how will China retaliate, as they have promised? Will Beijing ban BNOs from public office, from voting or even from leaving? What will the UK do then?

2px presentational grey line

Those eligible for the new visa can apply online and will need to book an appointment to attend a visa application centre.

And from 23 February, BNO status holders who hold an eligible biometric passport will be able to use an app to complete their application from home.

The visa fee to stay for five years will be £250 per person - or £180 for a 30-month stay - and there is an immigration health surcharge of up to £624-a-year.

Nathan Law, a pro-democracy campaigner who fled Hong Kong and now lives in exile in the UK, welcomed the announcement.

"It's a commitment to the historical agreement to Hong Kong and I think it's important that we offer safe exit for the people who are facing political suppression in Hong Kong," he told the BBC.

 

Donald Trump 'parts with lawyers' before impeachment trial

Trumpimage copyrightGetty Images
image captionDonald Trump is the first president in history to be impeached twice

Former US President Donald Trump has parted ways with lawyers representing him in his impeachment trial in the Senate, US media report.

The departure of Butch Bowers and Deborah Barbier was reportedly a mutual decision.

Mr Trump's trial for incitement to insurrection starts on 8 February.

Senators will be asked whether to convict him on a charge he incited insurrection at the US Capitol on 6 January, when five people died.

Greg Harris and Johnny Gasser, two former federal prosecutors from South Carolina, have also left the team, the Associated Press reports. They were reportedly unwilling to defend Mr Trump on the basis of alleged election fraud.

Josh Howard, a North Carolina attorney who was recently added to the team, has also left, CNN reports.

It is now unclear who will represent Mr Trump during the trial.

"We have done much work, but have not made a final decision on our legal team, which will be made shortly," tweeted Trump advisor Jason Miller in response to the reports.

Mr Trump is the first president in history to be impeached twice. He was impeached by the House in 2019 over his dealings with Ukraine, but acquitted by the Senate.

media captionHouse delivers impeachment charge against Donald Trump to the Senate

Now he is accused of inciting a mob that stormed Congress after he repeated false claims of election fraud.

But it is likely he will be acquitted again.

A total of 45 out of 50 Senate Republicans voted this week to consider stopping the trial before it even started on the grounds that presidents cannot face impeachment trials once they have left office.

It would take 17 Republican senators breaking ranks and voting alongside the 50 Democrats to convict the president, potentially preventing him from ever running for federal office again.

 

Navalny: Thousands join fresh protests across Russia

 protest in Moscow

Thousands of Russians have been taking part in unauthorised protests to demand the release of the jailed opposition leader Alexei Navalny.

More than 3,000 people have been detained, a monitoring group says. In Moscow police closed metro stations and blocked off the city centre.

Mr Navalny was jailed on his return to Russia after recovering from an attempt to kill him with a nerve agent.

He blames the security services for the attack but the Kremlin denies this.

The opposition figure had only just arrived from Berlin, where he spent months recovering from the near-fatal incident.

Russian authorities say Mr Navalny was supposed to report to police regularly because of a suspended sentence for embezzlement.

Mr Navalny has denounced his detention as "blatantly illegal", saying the authorities had allowed him to travel to Berlin for treatment for the Novichok poisoning, which happened in Russia last August.

protest in Moscowimage copyrightReuters
image captionPolice have restricted movement in central Moscow

Mr Navalny has blamed state security agents under Mr Putin's orders for the attempt on his life and investigative journalists have named Russian FSB agents suspected of the poisoning. But the Kremlin denies involvement and disputes the conclusion, by Western weapons experts, that Novichok was used.

Meanwhile, Russian President Vladimir Putin has denied reports he is the owner of a vast palace on the Black Sea, as alleged by Mr Navalny in a video that has gone viral in Russia and has been watched more than 100m times.

What's the latest?

In Moscow the BBC's Sarah Rainsford says protesters played cat-and-mouse with police, getting up close to officers before retreating to safety. Police snatch squads pulled some protesters through the lines of riot shields. Footage showed a stream of people being escorted on to buses by riot police.

Protesters then attempted to reach the Matrosskaya Tishina prison where Mr Navalny is being held.

Mr Navalny's wife Yulia Navalnaya is among those detained at Sunday's protest, Mr Navalny's team says. Earlier she posted a picture of herself on the way to the rally.

1px transparent line

Police say the protests are illegal, while Russian authorities have warned that the demonstrations could spread the coronavirus.

A 40-year-old protester in Moscow told Reuters she had attended despite having a panic attack the night before over the possible repercussions she could face for taking part.

"I understand that I live in a totally lawless state. In a police state, with no independent courts. In a country ruled by corruption. I would like to live differently," she said.

In St Petersburg, Mr Putin's home city, a crowd gathered in a central square and chanted: "Down with the Tsar."

St Petersburg rallyimage copyrightReuters
image captionCrowds in St Petersburg chanted: "Down with the Tsar"

Rallies in support of Mr Navalny have already taken place in eastern Russia. In the Siberian city of Novosibirsk, at least 2,000 people marched through the city chanting "Freedom" and "Putin is a thief".

In Yakutsk, where temperatures fell to -40C, a protester named Ivan said it was the first rally he had attended.

"I am tired of the despotism and lawlessness of the authorities. No questions have been answered. I want clarity, openness, and change. This is what made me come here," he said.

Protesters gather in Ordzhonikidze Square in the city of Yakutsk. 31 Jan 2021image copyrightGetty Images
image captionDozens of people in Yakutsk braved the extreme cold to protest against the government

Further rallies saw about 1,000 people demonstrate in Omsk, also in Siberia, and about 7,000 people protest in Yekaterinburg in the Ural region, according to local media reports.

The OVD-Info monitoring group said police had detained more than 3,000 people at protests in 82 cities across the country. They included 933 held in Moscow and 591 in St Petersburg.

The previous week's protests saw about 4,000 people detained nationwide.

A number of close associates of Mr Navalny have been detained since last week and others, including his brother and Pussy Riot activist Maria Alyokhina, have been put under house arrest.

protester in vladivostokimage copyrightReuters
image captionA protester in Vladivostok wears a mask that says: "Putin must resign"

The chief editor of a Russian website specialising in human rights, Sergei Smirnov, was also arrested outside his home on Saturday. News of his detention, apparently over allegations he participated in last week's protests, has been condemned by other journalists.

In Moscow, police have reportedly been struggling to find space in jail for supporters of the opposition leader.