Editorial The Babri Masjid verdict
Abjure violence

Hindu
youths clamour atop the 16th century Muslim Babri Mosque in this 06
December 1992 photo five hours before the structure was completely
demolished by hundreds supporting Hindu fundamentalist activ-ists.
Photo: AFP
A positive feature in this matter is that the aggrieved parties have all, without exception, called for calm, preferring the legal path to any other means. We believe that this is the rational way of addressing an issue which has been the cause of age-old friction between the two communities in India with the potential of perpetuating the friction unless the verdict is handled in a sensible and judicious manner. We also believe that violence has to be averted at all costs, as called for by all the parties including the Congress.
Without going into the merits of the cause or the arguments validating the decision, we would like to state that a mosque here or a temple there does not necessarily enhance the status of—nor denigrate—any particular religion. The location of a place of worship should in no way detract from the fundamental messages of the two major religions of the world—one that is being followed by more than a billion people all over the world, and another that has been in existence as a creed for the last 5,000 years. That would neither make nor break the core values of the religions, both of which espouse the cause of universal brotherhood and peace.
In this context, we would like to call upon the Bangladesh government to exercise careful vigil so that the situation cannot be exploited by the trouble-mongers. The unfortunate developments that followed in the wake of the December 1992 demolition of Babri Masjid should never be allowed to be repeated.
No comments