House charges Trump is 'singularly responsible' for inciting insurrection as ex-president's team claims he's protected by 1st Amendment
(CNN)The House impeachment managers charged Tuesday that former President Donald Trump is "singularly responsible" for inciting the insurrection at the US Capitol last month, while Trump's legal team argued his speech was protected by the First Amendment and a Senate conviction would be unconstitutional.
The
dueling pretrial legal briefs from the House managers and Trump's
lawyers detailed the major points that will be argued at next week's
trial, in the first real glimpse at how Trump's new legal team plans to
defend him after the House voted to impeach him last month.
In a 14-page response to the House's impeachment effort on
Tuesday, Trump's lawyers, Bruce Castor and David Schoen, argued that
the Senate cannot vote to impeach Trump when he no longer holds office
as well as that Trump's speech about the election and before the January
6 riots did not cause the riots and was protected by the First
Amendment.
"The
constitutional provision requires that a person actually hold office to
be impeached. Since the 45th President is no longer 'President,' the
clause 'shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for ...' is
impossible for the Senate to accomplish," Trump's team wrote.
The House impeachment managers, in their brief filed Tuesday,
pushed back directly on that point, which Senate Republicans have
coalesced around as a reason to acquit Trump, arguing there is ample
history and precedent to hold a trial and convict Trump, who was
impeached by the House while still in office.
"There
is no 'January Exception' to impeachment or any other provision of the
Constitution," the managers wrote. "A president must answer
comprehensively for his conduct in office from his first day in office
through his last."
House
Democrats noted that Trump was impeached while he still was president,
pushing back on Senate Republican arguments that Congress cannot impeach
a former official. Still, they argued there's a precedent for
impeaching former officials, too, as there have been a handful of such
cases in US history.
The
House managers laid out their case against Trump in their 80-page brief
filed Tuesday morning, in which they accused him of stirring up
violence against Congress in an attempt to upend the peaceful transfer
of power. They argued that the Senate should convict Trump and bar him
from holding future office after he "threatened the constitutional
system that protects the fundamental freedoms we cherish."
"President
Trump's responsibility for the events of January 6 is unmistakable,"
the House impeachment team wrote. "President Trump's effort to extend
his grip on power by fomenting violence against Congress was a profound
violation of the oath he swore. If provoking an insurrectionary riot
against a Joint Session of Congress after losing an election is not an
impeachable offense, it is hard to imagine what would be."
Both
the House impeachment managers and Trump's legal team are expected to
submit additional briefs ahead of the start of the trial on February 9.
The legal briefings will provide the backdrop for a case in which the
House impeachment managers face a skeptical Senate Republican
conference. Last week, 45 of the 50 GOP senators voted to support
dismissing the trial on constitutional grounds, a sign that the 67 votes
required for conviction are unlikely to materialize.
Trump briefing echoes false election claims
Trump's legal filing briefly touched on the former President's baseless and false claims that the election was stolen from him, disputing that his claims were false and arguing they were protected speech nevertheless.
"After
the November election, the 45th President exercised his First Amendment
right under the Constitution to express his belief that the election
results were suspect, since with very few exceptions, under the
convenient guise of Covid-19 pandemic 'safeguards' states election laws
and procedures were changed by local politicians or judges without the
necessary approvals from state legislatures," Trump's lawyers wrote.
"Insufficient evidence exists upon which a reasonable jurist could
conclude that the 45th President's statements were accurate or not, and
he therefore denies they were false."
There
was no evidence of widespread voter fraud, and Trump embraced
conspiracy theories to falsely claim the election was stolen from him.
The Justice Department confirmed it did not uncover evidence of widespread voter fraud.
Trump's filing Tuesday revives claims his campaign made about the
voting process that were repeatedly thrown out of the courts, which is
what led Trump to focus his efforts on the January 6 congressional
certification of the election, which was then disrupted by the
insurrectionists in the deadly riot.
Trump's
team denied the charge that his rhetoric in a speech on January 6 had
incited the mob that attacked the Capitol. "It is denied that President
Trump incited the crowd to engage in destructive behavior," his team
wrote. "It is denied that the phrase 'if you don't fight like hell
you're not going to have a country anymore' had anything to do with the
action at the Capitol as it was clearly about the need to fight for
election security in general, as evidenced by the recording of the
speech."
The
brief was filed by Trump's two new lawyers, Castor and Schoen, who took
over the former President's impeachment defense after five attorneys
who had initially signed on left his team over the weekend. It's unclear
how much Trump's new attorneys plan to wade into his false election
fraud claims during the trial next week -- one Senate Republican leader
warned Monday that it would be a "disservice" to his defense to do so.
'Like a loaded cannon'
The
House's pretrial brief provided the impeachment managers' most detailed
argument to date for why Trump's actions surrounding the January 6
attack on the Capitol warranted his second impeachment in a little over a
year, making him the first president in US history to have been
impeached twice.
The
impeachment managers charged that Trump's actions in the months leading
up to January 6 of baselessly claiming the election was stolen from him
created the conditions for a violent mob to be aimed "like a loaded
cannon down Pennsylvania Avenue" to attack the Capitol.
"President
Trump created a powder keg on January 6. Hundreds were prepared for
violence at his direction. They were prepared to do whatever it took to
keep him in power," the managers wrote. "All they needed to hear was
that their President needed them to 'fight like hell.' All they needed
was for President Trump to strike a match."
In
a preview of what's likely to be argued during next week's trial, the
Democrats' filing Tuesday underscored how the rioters themselves have
cited Trump as the reason they attacked the Capitol.
House
Democrats also charged that Trump failed to respond to the riot,
including reports that he had been "delighted" as the riot was
unfolding, and noting that his tweets had not attempted to tell the
rioters to leave the Capitol. Democrats argued that the events of
January 6 and the former President's involvement had longer-term
ramifications that threatened the security of President Joe Biden's
inauguration later that month and beyond. Roughly 25,000 National Guard
troops were deployed and state capitols around the country had to
enhance security.
The
Democrats also highlighted the bipartisan condemnation of the
President's conduct, citing Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell's
comments that the mob had been "provoked by the President" and
statements from the 10 Republican members, including No. 3 House
Republican Liz Cheney of Wyoming, who voted for impeachment.
"Representative
Liz Cheney put the point simply when she recognized that '[t]here has
never been a greater betrayal by a President of the United States of his
office and his oath to the Constitution,' " the impeachment managers
wrote.
The
Democrats' brief, which was filed two hours before Trump's, anticipated
some of the arguments they were likely to face, such as the speed at
which they had moved on impeachment, which the House voted on one week
after the riots. The managers dismissed those concerns, arguing that
"this case does not involve secretive conduct, or a hidden conspiracy,
requiring months or years of investigation."
House
Democrats pushed back on Trump's claims that his speech was protected
by the First Amendment, noting the First Amendment does not apply to an
impeachment proceeding, and even if it did, its free speech protections
do not extend to inciting violence.
"The
First Amendment protects private citizens from the government; it does
not protect government officials from accountability for their own
abuses in office," they wrote. "Speech is not protected where it is
'directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely
to incite or produce such action.'"
The
House's impeachment brief also made the case for the Senate to bar
Trump from holding future office. If the Senate convicts Trump, which
requires a two-thirds majority, it can also hold a vote on preventing
him from holding office again.
"Constitutional
history, text, and structure, as well as prior Congressional practice,
all confirm that the Senate has jurisdiction to try President Trump,"
the managers wrote. "So does common sense. While sworn to faithfully
execute the laws — and to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution
— President Trump incited insurrection against the United States
government. His conduct endangered the life of every single Member of
Congress, jeopardized the peaceful transition of power and line of
succession, and compromised our national security."
This story and headline have been updated with additional developments Tuesday.
No comments