India cuts internet around New Delhi as protesting farmers clash with police
New Delhi, India (CNN)Internet access remained blocked Monday in several districts of a state bordering India's capital following violent weekend clashes between police and farmers protesting controversial agricultural reforms.
Online
access would be suspended in at least 14 of 22 districts in Haryana
state near New Delhi, until 5 p.m. Monday, according to the Department
of Information and Public Relations of Haryana on Sunday. That order was
first imposed Tuesday in three Haryana districts for 24 hours, but has
been extended every day since.
A
48-hour internet shutdown was also imposed in three other areas around
Delhi's borders late on Friday, with India's Ministry of Home Affairs
saying the move was "in the interest of maintaining public safety and
averting public emergency."
According
to officials, those blackouts should have lifted on Sunday night, but
Paramjeet Singh Katyal, a spokesperson for Samyukta Kisan Morcha, an
umbrella body representing protesting farmers, said the internet was
still not working as of Monday.
The
internet restrictions came after violent scenes last week as
demonstrations continue against three agricultural laws passed in
September. Since late November, hundreds of thousands of protesters have
gathered on the outskirts of New Delhi to demonstrate against changes
they say they weren't consulted on and which will hurt their
livelihoods.
On
Tuesday last week -- a national holiday known as Republic Day that
marks the anniversary of the enactment of the country's constitution --
thousands of protesters stormed New Delhi's historic Red Fort as police used tear gas and batons against the demonstrators.
Dozens
of officers were injured and one protester died when a tractor
overturned during the protests near Delhi police headquarters, police
said Wednesday. More than 100 protesters are still missing, Samyukta
Kisan Morcha said Sunday.
An internet shutdown was also imposed in areas around New Delhi from midday to midnight on Tuesday.
Darshan Pal, a leader from Samyukta Kisan Morcha, condemned the internet shutdowns, calling the moves "undemocratic."
"The
government does not want the real facts to reach protesting farmers,
nor their peaceful conduct to reach the world," Pal said in a statement
Sunday. "It wants to spread its false spin around farmers. It is also
fearful of the coordinated work of the farmers' unions across different
protest sites and is trying to cut off communication means between
them."
Nevertheless,
farmers are still joining the protests, Samyukta Kisan Morcha's Katyal
said Monday. "Typically these village groups work against each other but
this time they have all united for the collective fight," Katyal said.
Additional
deputy commissioner of police in Delhi, Jeetendra Meena, said police
had deployed more forces at the border in case any protests break out
Monday.
Concerns over democracy
Although India is the world's most populous democracy, it also topped the world in terms of internet shutdowns in 2019, according to Access Now, an advocacy group which tracks internet freedom.
In 2019, the government imposed a months-long internet blackout in Indian-controlled Kashmir after India rewrote the constitution to remove Kashmir's protected autonomy.
That same year, authorities shut down internet in other areas, including in parts of New Delhi, amid widespread protests against a controversial citizenship law considered by many to be discriminatory against Muslims.
The approach is controversial. In India, some individual shutdowns
have been challenged in the courts, and there is an ongoing effort to
change the country's laws to make such blackouts more difficult to
impose.
The shutdowns also come against the backdrop of rising concerns about press freedom in India.
On
Saturday, Mandeep Punia, a freelance journalist covering the protests,
was arrested on the border between Delhi and Haryana, Punia's lawyer
Akram Khan told CNN Monday.
Punia
has been remanded to judicial custody for 14 days from Sunday, accused
of obstructing a public servant from discharging his duty and
voluntarily causing hurt and assault or criminal force to deter a public
servant from duty.
"(The)
accused was merely carrying out his journalistic duties and another
journalist was detained along with him but was released around
midnight," according to an application for Punia's bail.
But
Delhi police's Meena said Punia was not carrying an ID card when he was
caught in a scuffle between villagers and protesters. Meena said Punia
incited the farmers and pushed police.
Devdutta
Mukhopadhyay of Internet Freedom Foundation, a non-governmental
organization, said the government was using "extremely draconian"
measures and the internet suspension was disproportionate. Online access
remains restricted in the majority of Haryana, which impacts not just
protesters but citizens who have been forced to work and study from home
due to the coronavirus pandemic.
She
said there had been reports of mob violence against protesters, and
added that it was important for farmers to put forward their side of the
story as unbalanced reporting could foster a negative opinion among the
public.
The shutdown could set a "very dangerous precedent," she added.
"It's
not like you are taking down specific posts or pages that you think are
false or inflammatory, this is you shutting down an entire medium of
communication."
Last
week, India's Congress Party, along with 15 other Opposition parties,
wrote a joint letter, condemning the way the protesters had been handled
by Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government, calling their response "arrogant, adamant and undemocratic."
Why farmers are protesting
The
massive farmer protests have been a significant challenge to Modi as
months of demonstrations and sit-ins across the country against his key
agricultural policy have grown into a stalemate marked by deadlocked
talks between farmers and his administration.
For
decades, the Indian government offered guaranteed prices to farmers for
certain crops, providing long-term certainty that, in theory, allowed
them to make investments for the next crop cycle. The new rules allow
farmers to sell their goods to anyone for any price -- giving them more
freedom to do things such as sell directly to buyers and sell to other
states.
But
farmers argue that the new rules will leave them worse off by making it
easier for corporations to exploit agricultural workers, and help big
companies drive down prices. While farmers could sell crops at elevated
prices if the demand is there, conversely, they could struggle to meet
the minimum price in years when there is too much supply in the market.
The
laws have been so contentious because agriculture is the primary source
of livelihood for about 58% of India's 1.3 billion population, and
farmers have been arguing for years to get the minimum guaranteed prices
increased. They are the biggest voter block in the country -- making
farming a central political issue.
The
government has held rounds of talks with leaders of more than 30
farmers' unions that are opposed to the laws -- but the talks have gone
nowhere.
Last
month, India's Supreme Court issued an order putting the three
contentious farm laws on hold and ordered the formation of a four-member
mediation committee to help the parties negotiate. But farmers' leaders
have rejected any court-appointed mediation committee.
According
to Samyukta Kisan Morcha, at least 147 farmers have died during the
course of the months-long protests from a range of causes, including
suicide, road accidents and exposure to cold weather. Authorities have
not given an official figure on protester deaths.
No comments