How a tiny European country took on China over Taiwan
A curious spat has unfolded in recent months between Lithuania, a small, Eastern European nation of fewer than 3 million people, and China, a superpower with an economy that could soon exceed that of the United States.
It all started last year, when Lithuania poked Beijing in the eye -- twice in the space of a few months.
First,
it withdrew from the so-called "17+1" group, a forum in which 17
eastern and central European countries engage with China, before
encouraging others to do the same. Given China's numerous business
interests in the region, most notably the so-called Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) focused on infrastructure projects, any kind of European pushback is unwelcome in Beijing.
Then
in November, Lithuania became the first country in Europe to allow
self-ruled Taiwan to open a de facto embassy under the name "Taiwan."
Other such offices in Europe and the United States use the name Taipei,
Taiwan's capital, to avoid references that would imply the island's
independence from China. Taiwan's Foreign Ministry said the opening of
the Taiwanese Representative Office in Vilnius would "charter a new and
promising course for bilateral relations between Taiwan and Lithuania."
The
move enraged Beijing, which saw it as an affront to its "One China"
principle that insists Taiwan is part of China, rather than an
independent sovereign territory, despite the two sides having been
governed separately for over seven decades after a civil war. As a rule,
those who want a relationship with China must recognize the policy
diplomatically.
Lithuania
says the new Taiwan office does not have formal diplomatic status and
does not conflict with its One China policy. But Beijing reacted by
immediately downgrading diplomatic relations with Vilnius. Lithuania
also claimed that China has prevented Lithuanian goods from entering
China, effectively creating a trade barrier. The Chinese government has
repeatedly rejected these claims, blaming Lithuania for harming China's
"core interest" and sending bilateral ties to a deep freeze.
Taiwan reacted by buying up Lithuanian produce that was destined for China -- including 20,400 bottles of rum -- and pledging to invest hundreds of millions of dollars in Lithuanian industry to support the country in the face of Chinese pressure.
The
spat has pulled in the European Union, which is backing member state
Lithuania. Brussels sees Beijing's treatment of Lithuania as a threat to
other EU nations, many of whom have deeper economic links with China
and would like to deepen them further.
On
Thursday, the EU launched a case against China at the World Trade
Organization, accusing Beijing of "discriminatory trade practices
against Lithuania, which are also hitting other exports from the EU's
Single Market."
The
WTO case could be just the start of the EU taking a more hardline
stance on China, though there are reservations about whether doing so
could prompt Beijing to retaliate in the form of trade wars or canceled
investments in Europe.
'China needs to learn lessons'
In
1990, Lithuania became the first member of the Soviet Union to declare
independence from Moscow's ruling Communist Party. It then joined the EU
European Union and NATO in 2004 -- the very organization intended to be
a check on socialist expansion.
In
that context, a nation like China displaying aggression in its own
region, notably against Taiwan -- as well as using trade as a weapon
against smaller European nations -- naturally alarms those who remember
life under Soviet rule.
"China
needs to learn lessons because until now, they have been allowed to
behave in a way that doesn't adhere to our values and rules, simply
because they were so wealthy," Lithuania's former Prime Minister Andrius
Kubilius told CNN.
"I
don't see that bigger EU countries would have taken it upon themselves
to stand up. Maybe from Lithuania it will spread to others and in time,
Europe will stand united against a country that doesn't meet our
standards," he added.
One
of the reasons Lithuanian officials may be more comfortable than some
nations in taking this stance is that China is a relatively small export
market for the country. Only 1.18% of Lithuania's exports went to China
in 2019 -- compared with 13.1% to Russia and 3.64% to the US -- though
China is also one of Lithuania's fastest growing export markets, according to the Observatory of Economic Complexity.
For
Lithuania, this hardline stance is more than a moral mission. Officials
who spoke to CNN say that by standing up to China, they also hope to
send a message to Moscow.
Velina
Tchakarova, head of the Austrian Institute for European and Security
Policy, explains that Lithuania has "been under permanent Russian
pressure since joining NATO. Lithuania wants to set an example within
the European members that no one will succumb to autocratic regimes in
Beijing and Moscow."
Lithuanian
officials told CNN they hoped standing up to China might set a
precedent in the EU for pushing back on autocratic regimes. One senior
Lithuanian diplomat said the endgame was for Europe to have more
effective anti-coercion measures.
Brussels
recently proposed a legal mechanism that would allow the EU to respond
to economic intimidation in a "structured and uniform manner" by using a
"tailor-made and proportional response for each situation" which could
include tariffs, restricting imports and limiting access to the EU's
internal market.
But
many of the smaller EU nations are privately skeptical that their
fellow member states -- especially those who trade extensively with
China -- would back them when push comes to shove.
A
strong economic relationship with China is a key plank of the EU's
drive for "strategic autonomy," a term used in Brussels to describe the
EU becoming more independent from US influences as a geopolitical power.
The thinking was that by partnering with Beijing economically, Europe
could act as a bridge between the US and China, while not getting
squashed between the two.
Bigger
member states, most notably France, have been strong supporters of the
strategic autonomy drive. And while European politicians have grown
increasingly uncomfortable with China's treatment of Uyghur Muslims,
suppression of democracy in Hong Kong and aggression towards Taiwan,
when it comes to hard cash, many European countries are not quite ready
to alienate China.
Tchakarova
believes that by "bringing China into the debate, Lithuania seeks to
strengthen the US position in Europe, but also to warn Brussels and key
member states (Germany and France) of the potential risks and dangers
associated with bilateral relations with China in the future."
Essentially, they hope to force these countries to take a stand. So, will it work?
A delicate balance
Some
in Lithuania think their hardline stance has already produced results.
Officials point to the fact that France has backed them, along with the
rest of the EU, and called on China to deescalate the situation. This is
particularly significant right now, since France holds the EU's
rotating presidency and is also in the middle of a presidential election
campaign. Earlier this month, Slovenia announced that it too would seek to increase trade with Taiwan.
One
senior European Commission official told CNN Brussels' position is that
Lithuania has not gone against its One China policy, and that if China
continues to be hostile, it must provide evidence that the policy has
been breached, which Lithuanian officials are chalking up as a victory.
However, not everyone, even in Lithuania itself, thinks the strategy has been a wholesale success.
President
Gitanas Nauseda said that while he supported opening the Taiwanese
Representative Office, he thinks the name was needlessly provocative and
Lithuania must now deal with the "consequences."
Beijing
responded by saying acknowledging the mistake was a good start, but
still believes Lithuania to have broken the One China principle.
Brussels
has been getting its act together on geopolitical matters lately. After
years of bitter backbiting, it may be that Brexit and the pandemic have
reminded EU leaders that unity in areas of mutual interest means even
small nations like Lithuania can use the mechanics of the EU to stand up
to one of the richest, most powerful nations on earth.
Whether
Lithuania's stand -- and the EU taking a stand along with it -- will
result in any concessions from Beijing is another matter. A recent
editorial in the outspoken nationalistic state-run tabloid Global Times
issued a series of steps Lithuania must take to restore relations, and
warned: "no matter what tricks they play, China will never give in half
an inch on issues of principle."
But
experts agreed the only chance, however remote, of forcing any
concessions from China on the issue is for Europe to present a united
front.
Benedict
Rogers, a longstanding human rights campaigner and the chief executive
of Hong Kong Watch, says that while "China has shown it is very adept at
divide-and-rule and able to play countries off another ... when
countries stand together and stand up against China together, Beijing's
bullying tactics are less effective and pressure on China can have more
impact."
For
all this may seem a small spat, what's at stake is years of work in
which the EU has tried to find a way to reconcile its economic
relationship with China with its duty to member states and its moral
values. The question is for how much longer that balance can hold.
No comments