Story of human evolution gets another rewrite with DNA analysis of Chinese teeth
(CNN)Experts hailed the discovery in 2015 as "stunning" -- 47 teeth found in a cave in southern China dated back to 80,0000 to 120,000 years ago, challenging widely accepted ideas about human evolution.
It
suggested that Homo sapiens were in China at least 20,000 years earlier
than early modern humans had been previously believed to have left
Africa and spread around the world. It also tantalizingly hinted at the
possibility that a different group of early humans could have evolved
separately in Asia.
Not
so fast, says the science in 2021. New research published Monday has
suggested perhaps we shouldn't be so eager to rewrite the time line on
human origins.
DNA
analysis of two human teeth found in the same cave, called Fuyan, plus
teeth and other fossilized remains from four other caves in the same
region, suggested that it was unlikely early modern humans were in China
so early.
"Our
new research means it is very unlikely that Homo sapiens reached China
before 50,000 years ago. It is always possible that our species reached
the region more than 100,000 years ago, but we would have to say that
there is no convincing evidence in favor of this at present," said
Darren Curnoe, an associate professor at the Australian Museum Research
Institute in Sydney and coauthor of the paper that published in the
journal PNAS on Monday.
The
researchers were able to extract DNA from 10 human teeth and establish
the age of other materials in the caves, such as charcoal and animal
teeth, using a range of different methods. The team found that the teeth
were at least 16,000 years old, while the other materials were less
than 40,000 years old.
"The
2015 study relied heavily on the results of a single dating method
which determined the age of cave materials (flowstone) lying above and
below the sediments containing the human teeth," he said via email.
Flowstone is a sheetlike deposit of rock formed by flowing water.
"It
is well understood that the most reliable dates come directly from the
materials of interest to archaeologists, in this case, the human teeth.
Our new (dates), including direct ages, are far younger than previously
suggested."
The 2015 study measured the radioactive decay of uranium within cave deposits, not DNA.
Chris
Stringer, research leader for human evolution at the Natural History
Museum in London, said that the dates of Chinese fossilized teeth had
always stood out and it was right to investigate them further using
different methods.
However,
he said the study, while interesting, didn't definitively rule out
early modern humans in China before 50,000 years ago.
Complex family tree
Untangling
human ancestry is a complicated business, and recent research has
indicated the human family tree is much more bushy and less linear than
the traditional "Out of Africa" narrative, which suggested modern humans
originated in Africa and made their first successful migration to the
rest of the world in a single wave between 50,000 and 70,000 years ago.
Many
different ancient hominins existed and coexisted before Homo sapiens
emerged as the lone survivor, and there was interbreeding between
different groups of early humans.
Some
of these groups -- like Neanderthals -- are easily identified through
the fossil record and archaeological remains, but others -- like the
Denisovans -- have been largely identified by their genetic legacy.
Maria
Martinón-Torres, director of the National Research Center on Human
Evolution in Spain and an author of the 2015 study, said she welcomed
the new data on the early presence of modern humans in China.
However,
she noted that the two teeth from Fuyan Cave were uncovered in 2019 and
didn't belong to the original sample her team studied and published in
2015.
"The precise data about the location and morphology of the sample is crucial, but it is not provided in the paper," she said.
"I
agree that we should be working in improving the dates of all sites of
interest, especially with direct dating when possible. However, at the
moment, there is an increasing number of samples that would support the
presence of H. sapiens outside Africa before 50 ka (50,000 years ago),"
she said via email.
She
noted that there are other discoveries in Saudi Arabia, Israel, Sumatra
and Laos, and another site in China where a jawbone has been found,
that support the presence of Homo sapiens outside Africa before 50,000
years ago.
One
of the main factors supporting the idea that early modern humans left
Africa around 50,000 years ago is that there is a strong signal in the
genes of present-day human populations.
"We
would say that Out of Africa after 70,000 years ago seems to be the
dominant picture. We can't preclude earlier dispersals in other regions,
but certainly southern China seems to have been settled in this Out of
Africa wave after 50,000 years ago," Curnoe said via email.
However,
Martinón-Torres said this doesn't rule out the possibility that earlier
groups of Homo sapiens wandered around Asia earlier -- just as groups
of other early humans like Neanderthals and Denisovans did.
"We
had no expectations about the dating of these fossils and sites and
would have been pleased if we had confirmed an early dispersal. It would
certainly have made the history of our species much older than
generally believed, and perhaps more interesting," Curnoe said.
"Sadly, this seems not to be the case, at the least for southern China, according to our work."
No comments